In his book Money, Possessions and Eternity, Randy Alcorn writes:
"Someday this upside down world will be turned right side up, and nothing in all eternity will turn it back again. If we are wise, we will spend our brief lives on earth positioning ourselves for the turn."
This deserves some attentive thought and application. If this is true, and the world will soon be turning upside down, we should be "standing on our heads" so as to be ready for the flip. Could we "stand on our heads" by following Jesus' commands? Absolutely. Can we forsake the world, spread the Gospel, and love our neighbors for this reason? Of course. And not only can we apply God's Word so as to be storing up reward in heaven; we should be.
Sunday, April 29, 2007
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Do we really need that?
Lately, while preparing for my LIT talk tomorrow, I've been doing a lot of hard thinking on an even harder topic: Money and Possessions. I've been reading 1 Timothy, and it has one of the most convicting passages in the Bible:
6 Now there is great gain in godliness with contentment, 7 for we brought nothing into the world, and we cannot take anything out of the world. 8 But if we have food and clothing, with these we will be content. 9 But those who desire to be rich fall into temptation, into a snare, into many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. 10 For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils.
If you have food and clothing, you should be content. How radical is that? Boom. It blows everything you've thought (and bought) to pieces. Even if you're homeless, if you can survive, you should be content. Why? For one, every day thousands of people die of starvation or exposure. If you have a roof over your head, you should be even more thankful to God.
What does this practically mean for us? I believe that we have to completely forsake everything the world teaches us if we want to really follow God's command here. If you're reading this, you obviously have a computer. Do you really need a better computer? Do you have a TV? Do you really need a bigger, better model? And so on and so forth. When it comes down to it, we don't really need anything but what God talks about in 1 Timothy: food and clothing.
6 Now there is great gain in godliness with contentment, 7 for we brought nothing into the world, and we cannot take anything out of the world. 8 But if we have food and clothing, with these we will be content. 9 But those who desire to be rich fall into temptation, into a snare, into many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. 10 For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils.
If you have food and clothing, you should be content. How radical is that? Boom. It blows everything you've thought (and bought) to pieces. Even if you're homeless, if you can survive, you should be content. Why? For one, every day thousands of people die of starvation or exposure. If you have a roof over your head, you should be even more thankful to God.
What does this practically mean for us? I believe that we have to completely forsake everything the world teaches us if we want to really follow God's command here. If you're reading this, you obviously have a computer. Do you really need a better computer? Do you have a TV? Do you really need a bigger, better model? And so on and so forth. When it comes down to it, we don't really need anything but what God talks about in 1 Timothy: food and clothing.
Friday, April 13, 2007
Worship: What is it?
This is gonna be more of a discussion-type post. I'm intrigued by various Christian's views on worship, and I'd love to get your input. I myself think worship is a great way to glorify God. I've noticed, though, that some people, especially young people my age and younger, are unimpressed by the importance of worship. The best short treatise on worship, in my opinion, is the Westminster's Catechism's question: What is our purpose? The answer is: To glorify God and enjoy him forever. (Note: I may have not exactly quoted that correctly, it's been awhile since I've read it) "To glorify God and enjoy him forever." What better way of doing that can there be than worship?
I'd appreciate all comments on this post. I think it's a great topic.
ttyl
I'd appreciate all comments on this post. I think it's a great topic.
ttyl
Sunday, April 1, 2007
The Perfect Gospel
Here's my way of summing up the gospel: "A perfect God gives his perfect Son's life for perfectly evil creations to give them perfect righteousness.
In light of the amount of superlatives in that sentence, is there anything we should withold from God? He has given us the perfect gift--all of our life should be spent trying to live in a manner worthy of the gospel. Paul says: "be imitators of God," and "walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called." As I read the Bible, I can't help but realize my failings as a Christian, in that I do not imitate God or walk in a manner worthy of my calling. What I've realized is that to imitate God, one must live perfectly. Not perfectly like you will never sin--you will. But striving with all your heart, mind, and strength to walk in a manner worthy of the perfect gospel.
In light of the amount of superlatives in that sentence, is there anything we should withold from God? He has given us the perfect gift--all of our life should be spent trying to live in a manner worthy of the gospel. Paul says: "be imitators of God," and "walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called." As I read the Bible, I can't help but realize my failings as a Christian, in that I do not imitate God or walk in a manner worthy of my calling. What I've realized is that to imitate God, one must live perfectly. Not perfectly like you will never sin--you will. But striving with all your heart, mind, and strength to walk in a manner worthy of the perfect gospel.
Sunday, March 25, 2007
I Pledge Allegiance?
Derek Webb wrote a song whose chorus goes:
my first allegiance is not to a flag, a country, or a man
my first allegiance is not to democracy or blood
it's to a king & a kingdom
Wow. Here's a question for you: Where is your first allegiance? Is it to your state, your country, your political movement, or your God? Our first allegiance as Christians should be to God and his kingdom. This song ties in nicely with what Francis Schaeffer wrote in The Christian Manifesto:
"God has ordained the state as a delegated authority; it is not autonomous. The state is to be an agent of justice, to restrain evil by punishing the wrongdoer, and to protect the good in society. When it does the reverse, it has no proper authority. It is then a usurped authority and as such it becomes lawless and is tyranny."
This brings us to an interesting turning point: if the government legislates evil, what should Christians do? This is not an abstract possibility: as the bill on homosexuality under debate in England shows, Western democratic governments are not afraid to limit the rights of Christians. If a similar bill was passed in America, would Christians be brave enough to continue to denounce homosexuality as sin? What if it was made illegal to evangelize? Would Christians continue to spread the Word of God? In both of these examples, it would be necessary to use civil disobedience so we don't disobey God. So my answer to my first question would be: disobey, flee, and--if necessary--turn and fight. If the government uses my tax money to sponsor embryonic stem-cell research or to keep an abortion clinic going, I shouldn't pay my taxes. This is just my theory: feel free to correct me and play the devil's advocate.
my first allegiance is not to a flag, a country, or a man
my first allegiance is not to democracy or blood
it's to a king & a kingdom
Wow. Here's a question for you: Where is your first allegiance? Is it to your state, your country, your political movement, or your God? Our first allegiance as Christians should be to God and his kingdom. This song ties in nicely with what Francis Schaeffer wrote in The Christian Manifesto:
"God has ordained the state as a delegated authority; it is not autonomous. The state is to be an agent of justice, to restrain evil by punishing the wrongdoer, and to protect the good in society. When it does the reverse, it has no proper authority. It is then a usurped authority and as such it becomes lawless and is tyranny."
This brings us to an interesting turning point: if the government legislates evil, what should Christians do? This is not an abstract possibility: as the bill on homosexuality under debate in England shows, Western democratic governments are not afraid to limit the rights of Christians. If a similar bill was passed in America, would Christians be brave enough to continue to denounce homosexuality as sin? What if it was made illegal to evangelize? Would Christians continue to spread the Word of God? In both of these examples, it would be necessary to use civil disobedience so we don't disobey God. So my answer to my first question would be: disobey, flee, and--if necessary--turn and fight. If the government uses my tax money to sponsor embryonic stem-cell research or to keep an abortion clinic going, I shouldn't pay my taxes. This is just my theory: feel free to correct me and play the devil's advocate.
Thursday, March 22, 2007
Witness Like Paul
I was reading 1st Corinthians today, and found this great verse: "And my speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, that your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God." (1st Corinthians 2:4-5, italics added)
Paul used miracles to show the Corinthians the power of God and the Holy Spirit. But it doesn't take a miracle to show power. One of the greatest miracles of Christianity is the change in our hearts when we are saved. If we live to be like Jesus, our witness can show unbelievers the power of the Spirit. I think this might be one reason for the Church's decline in Europe and America. When a nonbeliever sees poor people starving on Skid Row just miles from Orange County, where Christians drive Porsches and watch cable TV on their plasma TVs, he can't help but see the hypocrisy of our uncompassionate use of wealth. Perhaps if more Christians used their wealth (trust me, if you're on the Internet reading my blog, you're wealthy compared with the rest of the world) compassionately, our witness would help show nonbelievers the power of God. As it is, we try to use "the wisdom of men", not "the power of God" in our evangelistic outreaches.
Paul used miracles to show the Corinthians the power of God and the Holy Spirit. But it doesn't take a miracle to show power. One of the greatest miracles of Christianity is the change in our hearts when we are saved. If we live to be like Jesus, our witness can show unbelievers the power of the Spirit. I think this might be one reason for the Church's decline in Europe and America. When a nonbeliever sees poor people starving on Skid Row just miles from Orange County, where Christians drive Porsches and watch cable TV on their plasma TVs, he can't help but see the hypocrisy of our uncompassionate use of wealth. Perhaps if more Christians used their wealth (trust me, if you're on the Internet reading my blog, you're wealthy compared with the rest of the world) compassionately, our witness would help show nonbelievers the power of God. As it is, we try to use "the wisdom of men", not "the power of God" in our evangelistic outreaches.
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
The Beginning of the End?
I found this article, initially written by Chuck Colson, on one of my small group's blogs.
Homosexual Practice Trumps Religious Belief
You may think the day would never come when preaching the Gospel would be illegal in a Western country—when governments would restrict what Christians can teach.
You would be wrong. The persecution against the Church has taken a decisive turn in the cradle of civil liberty—the United Kingdom (UK). And it will happen in America, also, if we do not wake up to the danger.
In London last month, the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights recommended regulations that would make it illegal for private, religious schools to teach that homosexual conduct is immoral. The committee claimed the regulations are needed to combat discrimination against homosexuals.
And we know about this. Last summer, the British government closed down our IFI unit because we teach that sex should be limited to heterosexual marriage. And if these regulations violate the rights of Christians—what does the government say? “Too bad.”
Luke Gormally, a fellow at London’s Linacre Centre, a Christian bioethics institute, put it this way: “The Committee could not be clearer in saying that they believe the freedom to live a practicing homosexual lifestyle trumps the freedom to live a religious lifestyle.”
The committee explicitly said that no exemption should be made for Christian schools. So, unbelievable though it sounds, Gormally notes, when it comes to sexual morality, the committee would make it illegal for Christian schools “to teach that Christianity and its principles are ‘objectively true.’”
Christian schools will not be alone in seeing their religious freedom stripped away. If this law passes, it will be difficult, if not impossible, for ministers to share the Bible’s teachings on sexual morality. Property owners who do not want, for moral reasons, to rent property to homosexuals will be breaking the law. So will Christian printers who refuse to print pro-gay literature.
Last Thursday, a House of Commons committee met to decide on the Sexual Orientation Regulations. Many MPs protested the Blair government’s refusal to allow a full debate in the House of Commons. And despite repeated appeals for a postponement, the chairperson insisted on taking an immediate vote: The regulations were upheld.
Now, the Blair government is attempting to rush the law through both houses of Parliament before opponents have time to organize. The vote will take place on Wednesday.
On that day, many Christians will be found at a prayer vigil in Old Palace Yard near the entrance to the House of Lords. We need to be praying with them, because it is going to take a miracle to keep this law from passing.
We must also realize that we are going to face this same kind of persecution if same-sex “marriage” is legalized in America. It’s already begun, especially in Massachusetts, where same-sex “marriage” was imposed by judges. For instance, a federal judge recently decreed that Christian parents cannot opt their kindergarteners out of public school classes that normalize homosexuality. And last year Catholic Charities shut down its adoption agencies rather than agree to send innocent children into homosexual homes.
This is why we desperately need to be vigilant—especially our religious liberty groups. This is why, for example, we need to pass a federal marriage amendment. If we do nothing, we are going to be facing the same future that Christians in the UK are facing: a future in which preaching the truths of the Gospel is against the law.
One can see where this is leading: the outlawing of Christianity in Western civilization. This is why missionary work is so important in America and Europe.
Homosexual Practice Trumps Religious Belief
You may think the day would never come when preaching the Gospel would be illegal in a Western country—when governments would restrict what Christians can teach.
You would be wrong. The persecution against the Church has taken a decisive turn in the cradle of civil liberty—the United Kingdom (UK). And it will happen in America, also, if we do not wake up to the danger.
In London last month, the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights recommended regulations that would make it illegal for private, religious schools to teach that homosexual conduct is immoral. The committee claimed the regulations are needed to combat discrimination against homosexuals.
And we know about this. Last summer, the British government closed down our IFI unit because we teach that sex should be limited to heterosexual marriage. And if these regulations violate the rights of Christians—what does the government say? “Too bad.”
Luke Gormally, a fellow at London’s Linacre Centre, a Christian bioethics institute, put it this way: “The Committee could not be clearer in saying that they believe the freedom to live a practicing homosexual lifestyle trumps the freedom to live a religious lifestyle.”
The committee explicitly said that no exemption should be made for Christian schools. So, unbelievable though it sounds, Gormally notes, when it comes to sexual morality, the committee would make it illegal for Christian schools “to teach that Christianity and its principles are ‘objectively true.’”
Christian schools will not be alone in seeing their religious freedom stripped away. If this law passes, it will be difficult, if not impossible, for ministers to share the Bible’s teachings on sexual morality. Property owners who do not want, for moral reasons, to rent property to homosexuals will be breaking the law. So will Christian printers who refuse to print pro-gay literature.
Last Thursday, a House of Commons committee met to decide on the Sexual Orientation Regulations. Many MPs protested the Blair government’s refusal to allow a full debate in the House of Commons. And despite repeated appeals for a postponement, the chairperson insisted on taking an immediate vote: The regulations were upheld.
Now, the Blair government is attempting to rush the law through both houses of Parliament before opponents have time to organize. The vote will take place on Wednesday.
On that day, many Christians will be found at a prayer vigil in Old Palace Yard near the entrance to the House of Lords. We need to be praying with them, because it is going to take a miracle to keep this law from passing.
We must also realize that we are going to face this same kind of persecution if same-sex “marriage” is legalized in America. It’s already begun, especially in Massachusetts, where same-sex “marriage” was imposed by judges. For instance, a federal judge recently decreed that Christian parents cannot opt their kindergarteners out of public school classes that normalize homosexuality. And last year Catholic Charities shut down its adoption agencies rather than agree to send innocent children into homosexual homes.
This is why we desperately need to be vigilant—especially our religious liberty groups. This is why, for example, we need to pass a federal marriage amendment. If we do nothing, we are going to be facing the same future that Christians in the UK are facing: a future in which preaching the truths of the Gospel is against the law.
One can see where this is leading: the outlawing of Christianity in Western civilization. This is why missionary work is so important in America and Europe.
Monday, March 19, 2007
More on the Internet
My first post on this blog was, interestingly enough, on the Internet. I've recently become more and more convicted by my wasteful use of time on the Internet. While there are many ways we can grow as Christians by using the Internet, most of what's popular on the Internet is not beneficial to our walk with Christ. It was not until recently that I began to see a lack of Christianity, in a way, in my life. I had completely separated church and Bible reading from the rest of my life. But God doesn't ask his followers to read his word fifteen minutes a day, he wants complete control over our lives. My thinking on this is that wasting time is a sin. If we're not always consumed by the gospel, we are at least lukewarm Christians, if not idolaters. So, I've decided to not spend time on the Internet. I'll still read the great blogs written by people like Dr. Al Mohler, and I'll still check my email, but if I feel like checking out the newest Diet Coke and Mentos video on YouTube, I'll read my Bible instead.
Saved to Be Holy
Romans 2:4 says, "Or do you presume on the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience, not knowing that God's kindness is meant to lead you to repentance?" [Italics added by me]
This is a great verse I stumbled upon while I was reading the Bible just now. "God's kindness is meant to lead you to repentance." I've also heard this explained like, "Saved to be Holy." As Christians, we have a duty to God to repent--literally to turn away from what is evil.
This is a great verse I stumbled upon while I was reading the Bible just now. "God's kindness is meant to lead you to repentance." I've also heard this explained like, "Saved to be Holy." As Christians, we have a duty to God to repent--literally to turn away from what is evil.
Monday, March 12, 2007
Escape from Reason
I was reading Francis Schaeffer’s "Escape from Reason" the other night, when I stumbled upon this nugget: “Today we have a weakness in our educational process in failing to understand the natural associations between the disciplines. We tend to study all our disciplines in unrelated parallel lines. This tends to be true in both Christian and secular education. This is one of the reasons why evangelical Christians have been taken by surprise at the tremendous shift that has come in our generation. We have studied our exegesis as exegesis, our theology as theology, our philosophy as philosophy; we study something about art as art; we study music as music, without understanding that these are things of man, and the things of man are not unrelated parallel lines.
This may be the high point of Schaeffer’s insightful tutorial in modern philosophy. One of his recurrent themes in his writings is that of the interconnectedness of art and philosophy, but he describes his position best in "Escape from Reason".
This may be the high point of Schaeffer’s insightful tutorial in modern philosophy. One of his recurrent themes in his writings is that of the interconnectedness of art and philosophy, but he describes his position best in "Escape from Reason".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
